A Better Translation

Why has no one made a better translation of the Bible?

I went to a mobile Bible Museum this summer.  While I found the exhibits interesting, I would have rather that it had not been a guided tour.

On the left side were exhibits from ancient times until about 1900 AD.  On the right side were exhibits from then until now.

When the young woman explained things on the left side, there was one historical error after another in her presentation.  I resisted the temptation to correct any of them due to the limited time of the tour  - especially since they were already behind schedule when they started our group.

However, her presentation on the right side was much better.  It was largely focused on how people smuggled Bibles in places like the former Soviet Union and new insights into the complexity of the Bible that had been discovered using modern technology.

One thing of great interest was exhibit that mapped out all the connections formed by references in one line in the Bible to other lines of the Bible.  Way more than 10,000 had been found by computer analysis.

This was far more than any other book that had been analyzed like War And Peace.  These references went both directions and included connections between books of the Bible that were written at the same time by people who were a thousand miles (1,600 km) from each other.

It would have been almost impossible for a single person to accomplish if they had written all the books of Bible themselves.  It was impossible for this to happen when the books were written by over forty authors on three different continents in three different languages over a period of eighteen hundred years.

This showed that the Bible had to have a single author of unimaginable intelligence that dictated the books to the author of each book in it.  It showed that the Book of Truth (The Bible) could have only been written by the Father of Truth (YHVH aka God aka THE LORD).

Another thing that caught my attention was the comparisons of the text of Dead Sea Scrolls to the text of various translations performed by various people using computers.  These analysis compared the meaning of the Hebrew words of the books of the Bible found in the Dead Sea Scroll with the meaning of the words of each translation at the time when the translation was made.

The King James was shown to be far more accurate than any other English translation.  It had only had about 0.05% mistranslated words.

Most of those errors were caused by errors in the Second Rabbinic Bible used for the Hebrew text in translating it.  This source text had inherited these errors from the Masoretic Text.  The Masoretic Text was the oldest known Hebrew text at the time when the King James Version was made and touted by the Rabbis as the most accurate.

However, the Masoretic Text does not agree with the Greek Septuagint translation in a number of places.  In every single place where the disagreement occurs between the two, the text of the Dead Sea Scrolls agrees with the Greek Septuagint. 

Some of these are of things like the height of Goliath which is six cubits in the Masoretic Text but is only four cubits in the Septuagint and the Dead Sea Scrolls.  Most concern identifying the Messiah of Israel like Psalms 22.

Most of the errors that people assert that are in the King James Version are actually errors caused by their lack of knowledge about the meaning of the words in it.  Anyone can skim over the surface and make ignorant statements about things that they did not bother to research.

For example, the word “nephew” in the King James Version when it was written meant “grandson” today (1 Timothy 5:4).  This is sometimes cited as a mistranslation of the Greek word “enkonos” in the King James Version but in reality it was accurate at the time of the translation.

There are other problems with King James Version.

For example, the genealogy of the Man of Truth (Yah'shau aka Yeshua HaMashiach aka Jesus) in the King James Version of the Gospel of Matthew has only thirteen generations listed between the carry away from Babylon until his birth even though the summary below it says that there are fourteen generations (Matthew 1:12-17).  This also does not match the number of generations from Zorobabel to his birth found in the King James Version of the Gospel of Luke (Luke 3:23-27).

He is a descendant of King David through Solomon in the King James Version of the Gospel of Matthew (Matthew 1:6-16).  However, he is a descendant of King David through Nathan in the King James Version of the Gospel of Luke (Luke 3:23-31).

When the Greek manuscripts are examined that the King James Version was translated from, it is shown that this not a translation error by the translators.  They also contain these contradictions.

Even the oldest Greek manuscripts of the Renewed Covenant (B'rit Chadashah aka The New Testament) ever found contain these contradictions.  Even the oldest Greek copies of these individual books that are older than the oldest Greek manuscript contain these contradictions.

So, these contradictions are not found only in the King James Version but also in almost every modern translation including the New International Version.  It even exists in the Orthodox Jewish Bible.

However, if there had been such a contradiction when the Man of Truth was born, then his enemies would have found it and made it known.  His entire claim to be the Messiah of Israel depended upon having the right linage.

They would have been able to find out quickly since the linage of all of the returning exiles and their descendants were kept at the Temple since the time of Nehemiah (Nechemyah) (Nehemiah 7:5).  The fact that his enemies never included this in their many reasons to reject his claim tells us that these contradictions did not exist when the Man of Truth walked the Earth.

So, this means that the problem has to be with the Greek source documents.  This is not conjecture for every single Church historian before 300 AD says that the Gospel of Matthew was written in Hebrew originally and then translated into Greek.

According to Eusebius, the translators were not speakers of Hebrew and had to try to translate as best as they could.  Consequently, they made several mistakes in translating from Hebrew to Koine Greek.  These included a mistake concerning Mary the Jew – the mother of the Man of Truth.

The Hebrew copies of the Gospel of Matthew that are older than the Greek copies say Joseph the father of Mary (Mariam).  This removes the contradictions completely and explains why the enemies of the Man of Truth were not able to discredit him based on his genealogy.

The reason that the original Greek translators used “husband” instead of “father” for “ab” was that they used the Greek copies of the Gospel of Luke and Gospel of Mark for comparison to their Greek translation of the Hebrew Gospel of Matthew.  In those texts Joseph is only called the husband of Mary, but Joseph the father of Mary is never mentioned, so they assumed that “ab” also meant husband.

It did not occur to them that the father of Mary could have the same name as her husband.  This error got perpetuated in new Greek copies in the Gospel of Matthew.

However, it has been long known as shown above that the language of the Renewed Covenant was not just Greek.  In fact, some of these Church historians went to India to obtain a copy of the Gospel of Matthew written in Hebrew reportedly by Matthew the Jew (Matityahu aka the Apostle Matthew) himself.

They brought it back and had it placed in the Library of Alexandria in Egypt after the False Church of Rome became the official church of the Roman Empire.  It remained there until the Crusaders recaptured Alexandria from the Muslims and it was placed in the Vatican.

In fact, the Vatican has many copies of the Gospel of Matthew written in Hebrew within its vaults.  Many have not been catalog, but some like Vatican 100 have been.

So, again the fault is not in the translation work of the King James Version translators but in the text that they translated from just like had happened with the Masoretic Text.  Other translations that used the same faulty Greek text have the same mistakes.

There are also a few other errors where the translators chose the wrong word in a few places outside of the Gospel of Matthew in the King James Version.  For example, they translated “Iesus” as “Jesus” instead of “Joshua” who led the people of Israel into the Promised Land (Act 7:45).

In Greek and Hebrew they both have the same name - but not in English.  It should have been translated as Joshua who actually did this in the book that bears his name in English.

However, other translations have even more translation issues.

This has been shown by analysis performed by computers numerous times.  Most of these analysis have been performed on different parts of the Book of Truth by different groups.

For one thing, as shown above, these newer translations repeat many of the mistakes of the King James Version instead of correcting them.  Then they add new mistakes on top of those.

Among them is the one disturbing sentence found in the New International Version and many other translations.  It was not found in any English translation until it was first included in the Revised Standard Version in 1946.

Adding “(Thus saying he declared all foods clean)” in their translation of Mark 7:19 was a purposeful attempt to distance the Man of Truth from the Law of Truth (Torah aka The Law).  It was part of a movement based on higher criticism to create an American Jesus who was less Jewish that Americans would find more relatable.

On top of that, many translations like the New International Version have footnotes that undermine the authority of the text.  For example there is such a footnote for the resurrection of the Man of Truth, the giving of the Great Commission, and the promise of power to back up the message of the Great Commission, found in Mark 16:9-20.

Their claim is that the oldest and most reliable manuscripts do not contain the footnoted passages.  This is mostly based on the Sinaiticus which is claimed to be the oldest complete manuscript.  However, this is not even true because it is missing significant parts of the Original Covenant (Tanakh aka The Old Testament) as well as parts of the Renewed Covenant as described above.

More than that, the text in it is far from pristine as it contains over 23,000 corrections and numerous variations of the same passages of scripture that do not agree with each other.  It is full of editorial instability and would never pass the rigorous standards applied to Rabbinic or Byzantine manuscripts – or even later Catholic manuscripts.  This is probably why some folios (pages) of it were found in a discard basket destined for the trash heap.

More than that, it is not oldest document that contains the Greek text of the Renewed Covenant.  There are many older documents that contain all or parts of every book of the Renewed Covenant.  Every single passage that is missing from the Sinaiticus has been found among these older documents.

For example, the ending of the Gospel of Mark noted above was found in Papyrus 45.  It was discovered in the 1930s and was available to the translators of the New International Version that was translated in the 1960s.  It was very poor scholarship on their behalf at best to add this footnote.

However, it is more likely that this older copy of the Gospel of Mark was intentionally ignored to boost their claims about the Sinaiticus and to cast doubt on the ending of the Gospel of Mark.  The ending of the Gospel of Mark is very troubling to many preachers because it says that supernatural signs will confirm that they are preaching what the Man of Truth preached and teaching what he taught.

Examples of this being done was when the Father of Truth raised my son from the dead because He knew that I would fulfill the vow that I made to Him and how the Man of Truth stood between the Impossible Girl and death three times.  These things were done because I was preaching what the Man of Truth preached and teaching what he taught.

However, these signs never occur at any time throughout their entire denomination.  These verses shows that this is the case because they are not preaching what the Man of Truth preached and teaching what he taught.

They are probably not preaching what the Man of Truth preached and teaching what he taught to avoid persecution.

The Man of Truth also promised that those who did what he did would be persecuted – even by their own families (Matthew 10:35-37).  For example, the persecution by my own father - even as I strived my entire life to fulfill the promise that I made to him after my parents divorced.

However, most of the persecution in America is economic.

For example, I was fired numerous times by Corporate America because I would never go along with evil to get along with evil people like a good Nazi.  This was after saving these companies literally hundreds of millions of dollars over my career by reporting fraud waste and abuse, eliminating costly inefficiencies, closing IT security holes, and preventing them from making disastrous business mistakes.

These religious professionals simply are not willing to suffer such economic persecution. They also value unity with each other over obedience to the Man of Truth.

After all, he is the most divisive man who ever lived.  You cannot preach what he preached and teach what he taught without causing division between those who are willing to change their beliefs to match his teachings and those who refuse to do so.

Since they refuse to change their message to match his message to avoid persecution and avoid causing division, there are no supernatural signs to confirm that their message is the message of the Father of Truth.  So, a translation like the New International Version that discredits this confirmation is very appealing to them.

This is at the heart of why no one has made a better translation.

The first English translation was by John Wycliff.  How did the religious professionals repay him for his long labor and toil to create as accurate of a translation as possible that was available to everyone who could read English?

He was put on trial for heresy five times by the False Church of Rome.  He was fired from his position at Oxford University and driven out of public life.  After death, he was declared a heretic and his remains were exhumed, burned, and scattered to erase his memory.

His followers, called the Lollards, continued his work and published his English translation among the peasants – who they taught how to read.  They also published his translation among the nobility.  They were likewise persecuted for about a hundred years for their efforts with many of them being martyred.

Afterwards, William Tyndale made a more accurate English translation based on Hebrew and Greek text that John Wycliff did not have access to.  How did the religious professionals repay him for his long labor and toil to create the most accurate translation possible for everyone who could read English?

He was forced to flee England, and they burned the first copies that were smuggled into England.  Ultimately, these religious professionals paid a friend to betray him.  This led to William Tyndale being strangled and then burned at the stake.

Afterwards, when the Church of England broke off from the Roman Catholic Church, the Church of England had the Great Bible created as the official Bible of England.  It was virtually a word for word copy of the Tyndale Bible and the work of his disciples – but it did not give Tyndale credit for his work to translate it.

Later the Great Bible was used to create the Geneva Bible – the first translation to had chapter and verse numbers to make it easier to find the location of passages in the scriptures.  That was in turn used to create the King James Version.

In fact 80% to 90% of the Renewed Covenant in the King James Version is the work of William Tyndale.  Much of his translation work of the Original Covenant from Hebrew was destroyed, but most of the Pentateuch (Genesis through Deuteronomy) and Job in the King James Version are his work.  The rest are mostly from the Matthew Bible that one of his disciples, Myles Covendale, created to finish the work that Tyndale had been executed to end.

So, the payment that the religious professionals gave for making an accurate word-for-word translation in English was persecution and death.  What payment did they give for making a less accurate thought-for-thought translation that was more to their liking?

Over 450 million copies of the New International Version have been sold with the original translation corporation collecting around a 10% licensing fee for each copy sold.  The publishing companies report that as much as 84% of their sales every year are from this one translation.  Retailers have also made millions of dollars selling this translation. In short, the religious professionals have paid billions of dollars for a translation that has been altered to say what they want it to say.

So making a better translation that helps people better understand how to better follow the Man of Truth leads to persecution and death while making a polluted translation that tells people a message that they want to hear leads to great wealth and influence.  Therefore, no one has made a better translation.

How far does this resistance to making a better translation go?

It has not just been the New International Version that has followed this process.  In fact, eight out of the top ten selling English translations have the exact same errors as it.  The only two that do not are the King James and the New King James.

Even supposedly more accurate Jewish translations like the Complete Jewish Bible contain the same errors as the New International Version.  So, they are all actually less accurate than the King James Version – even though they could have been made more accurate.

Some of these translations were not only published with these known errors but have introduced new ones as well that cannot be supported by original source documents.  They disagree with other translations, but appeal to niche groups by saying things that those groups want to hear.

For example, the Inclusive Bible removes all references to gender differences.  So, Genesis 1:27 reads “humankind in God’s Image” instead of “male and female created He them”.  The Divine Feminine Version takes this further by referring to the Father of Truth as the Mother and the Man of Truth as the Daughter.

Another example is the New World Translation that alters the text to remove any reference to the Man of Truth also being God.  It changes John 1:1 to read “the Word was a god” using the same wording that is used of demons and idols in other places.

Other translations like the Cepher Bible include the so-called Missing Books of The Bible as scripture.  This includes the Book of Enoch that contradicts the Book of Truth in many places and is specifically referenced in scripture as an example of the Jewish fables that we are commanded to avoid.

People can find a translation that suits what ever they want to believe – without regard to the actual words of the original source documents.  If not, then they will make one up to gain followers who also want a translation that tells them what they want to hear.

This is why it is so important to know how to pick a good translation.  Otherwise, you can end up believing another Gospel that was given by another spirit that tells about another Jesus instead the one given by the Spirit of Truth (Ruach HaQodesh aka The Holy Spirit aka The Holy Ghost) that tells about the Man of Truth.

It would not be hard to make a better translation.

The problems of the King James Version using 400-year-old English have already been largely solved by modern updates to it like the New King James and the 21^st Century King James translations.  They could be used as the basis of a better translation.

The known issues with all translations – including these updates of the King James Version – could easily be fixed.  It is already known what they should be saying instead as shown above.  It is really just a matter of making the fixes.

The truth is there are not really that many of issues to be fixed as shown by the comparison of the King James Version to the Dead Sea Scrolls.  None of them concern things essential to coming to faith in the Man of Truth.

Still, this does not mean that these errors are unimportant.  Leaving them uncorrected gives room for skeptics to attack the validity of the Book of Truth.

Also, no translation should contain known errors because those are known corruptions of the contents of the Book of Truth.  It contains the Incorruptible Word and every translation should reflect that.

However, you do not need to wait for a better translation to come into the House of Truth.  Almost every translation will tell you how to do that.

You need to know that the wages of sin is death (Romans 6:23).  You need to know that sin is transgression of the Law of Truth (1 John 3:4).

You need to know that sin is about the heart – that you will be judged for your thoughts and not just your deeds (Matthew 5:27-29).  You need to know that those with sin in their hearts will suffer eternally under the wrath of the Father of Truth (Ephesians 5:3-6).

You need to know that the Father of Truth loved you so much that He sent His son to die in your place to save you from His wrath (Romans 5:8-9).  You need to know that He does not want you to be eternally perish (2 Peter 3:9).

You need to know that anyone who call the Man of Truth “Lord” - but does not obey him - is a fool that will be destroyed (Matthew 7:21-27).  You need to know that if you truly make him lord of your life because you believe in your heart that the Father of Truth raised him from the dead, then you will be saved (Romans 10:9).

Come into the House of Truth!

The Book Of Enoch

Should the Book of Enoch be in of the Bible?

In the Book of Jude, a verse regarding Enoch from the Book of Enoch is quoted (Jude 1:14-15).  For this reason, many have contended that the Book of Enoch should be in the Book of Truth (The Bible) as well.

However, merely quoting from a source is not sufficient to show that the entire source should be in the Book of Truth.  Jude the Jew also quotes from a lost source that appears to be the Assumption of Mose regarding the body of Moses (Jude 1:9).

There is only one known copy of the Assumption of Moses in existence.  It is from the sixth century AD, and it is incomplete – missing the section that Jude the Jew is presumed to be quoting from.  However, writers with access to this document before 200 AD like Origen wrote that the complete manuscript contained the quote found in the Book of Jude.

So, it is certain that the Assumption of Moses that Jude the Jew quotes should not be in the Book of Truth just because he quotes from it.  No part of the Book of Truth can ever be lost because the Father of Truth (YHVH aka God aka THE LORD) watches over the Indestructible Book to preserve it as He promised.

If one were to insist that the Assumption of Moses should be in the Book of Truth because of a single quote from it, then they would be insisting that the Father of Truth was liar who was not able to preserve His word through all generations as He promised.  The same thing would be true about any other source that was quoted but the source was not preserved.

Since the Assumption of Moses is not part of the Book of Truth, then why does Jude the Jew use this quote?  There are two reasons for this.

First, he is warning against false teachers that are bringing in teachings contrary to the Book of Truth to speak evil concerning Heavenly dignitaries – Angels (Jude 1:3-8).  He is using a quote from one of their own sources to convict them of their evil.

This is the same thing that Paul the Jew (Shaul aka Saul aka the Apostle Paul) did when he quoted the writings of the Greek poet Aratus to convict the Greak philosophers of their sin of idol worship at Mars Hills (Acts 17:28-30).  He also did this when he wrote to Titus the Gentile about Cretans that had gone astray (Titus 1:12-13).

The other reason was that the quote contained truth – just like the quotes that Paul the Jew had used.  However, acknowledging that a part is truth does not mean that the whole that it is taken from is truth.

When the Father of Lies (HaShatan aka Satan Aka The Devil) tempted Eve he used truth to lead her to believe a lie (Genesis 3:4-5).  Even the Father of Truth confirmed that that part of what he had said was truth (Genesis 3:22).

In the same way, Jude the Jew included this quote to reveal a truth that had not been revealed previously in the Book of Truth.  He could see that this quote was consistent with other passages in the Book of Truth.

Mose the Prophet of Truth was indeed buried in hidden grave by the Father of Truth (Deuteronomy 34:5-6).  Jude the Jew understood that the Father of Truth could have been counted as having done it Himself if he had commissioned Michael the Angel of Truth to do it, just a David was counted as taking Zion because he commissioned someone else to do it (2 Samuel 5:7-9).

Jude the Jew also knew that the Angel of the Father of Truth had been resisted by the Father of Lies concerning Joshua the Priest of Truth and the Angel of the Father of Truth had prevailed by saying “the Lord rebuke you” without bringing any accusation against the Father of Lies (Zechariah 3:1-5).  So, the quote concerning the Father of Lies resisting Michael the Angel of Truth burying the body of Moses the Prophet of Truth and Michael the Angel of Truth prevailing by saying “the Lord rebuke you” without bringing any accusation against the Father of Lies was consistent with the rest of the Book of Truth.

So, Jude the Jew included the quote from the Assumption of Moses because it was the one part of the book that contained truth.  This truth provided an example of how believers should handle encounters with the Father of Lies and Angels of Lies.

Are the same things true about the quote from the Book of Enoch?

So, when Jude the Jew went on to quote from the Book of Enoch, he  could have been using one of their own sources against them.  This is exactly what he had done before with his quote from the Assumption of Moses.

Jude the Jew knew that when the Father of Truth came with ten thousand of the Children of Truth when He came to give the Law of Truth (Torah aka The Law) to Moses the Prophet of Truth (Deuteronomy 33:1-3).  He knew that when the Man of Truth comes to bring judgment upon the Gentiles for their wickedness that the resurrected Children of Truth are going to carry out that judgment (Psalm 149:5-9).

So, Jude the Jew could see that this quote from the Book of Enoch was consistent with what had already been revealed in the Book of Truth just like his quote from the Assumption of Moses.  This quote also made this truth a little clearer.

One thing is certain about the inclusion of these quotes in the Book of Jude – they are not a mistake for this inclusion was inspired by the Father of Truth (2 Timothy 3:16).  Jude the Jew was only a scribe for the Spirit of Truth who is the author of all scripture (2 Peter 1:20-21).

So, it can be certain that Jude the Jew used the quote from the Book of Enoch for the same purposes that he had used the quote from the Assumption of Moses.  However, whether or not it should be in the Book of Truth still depends upon the book itself.

So, it is time to examine the Book of Enoch itself.

The first thing to examine is whether the contents of the Book of Enoch have been preserved as the Father of Truth promised to do with His Word.  If not, then like the Assumption of Moses, it is not part of the Book of Truth.

We have to begin with clarification of what we mean by the Book of Enoch because there were actually three books called that written at different times in different languages at different places.  They are commonly referred to as 1 Enoch, 2 Enoch, and 3 Enoch based on the order that they were written in.

The oldest fragment of 1 Enoch is from about 300 BC.  The earliest parts were written in Hebrew in Israel, but later parts were written in Aramaic.

The oldest reference to 2 Enoch is from around 100 AD.  It was reputed to be written in Greek outside of Israel, but the oldest known fragment is from about 800 AD in Slavic.

The oldest reference to 3 Enoch is after 135 AD.  It was written in Hebrew, Greek, and Latin at Babylon.

So, we can see that 1 Enoch is the only Book of Enoch that Jude the Jew could have been quoting.  The later two versions both build upon and contradict it.

The next thing to examine is the contents of 1 Enoch to compare it to the contents of the Book of Truth for consistency.   We will begin with how it is structured.

1 Enoch actually is composed of five separate books that collectively have 108 chapters.  We will give a brief synopsis of each book.

This arrangement of five books inside 1 Enoch is not problematic.  Psalms also has five books inside it – one for each book of the Law of Truth.

The first book is the Book of Watchers, and it has thirty-six chapters.  It is mostly concerned with fallen Angels called the Watchers and their efforts to corrupt mankind.

The second book is the Book of Parables of Enoch, and it has thirty-five chapters.  It contains three parables that tell of the judgment that will come upon the Watchers and the people that they have corrupted.  It ends with the final translation of Enoch into heaven and two other short visions that he had before being translated.

The third book is the Astronomical Book, and it has eleven chapters.  It contains details of a Solar calendar that Enoch had revealed to him as the correct calendar for determining the seasons.

The fourth book is the Book of Dream Visions, and it has eight chapters.  It has a series of dream visions that tell the history of the people of Israel starting with the flood of Noah and ending with the New Jerusalem.  Some dream visions with symbolic animals are interspersed through it.

The final book is the Epistle of Enoch, and it is eighteen chapters.  It is a series of warnings that Enoch leaves to his descendants before his translation that cover everything that is going to happen until he is reunited with them in the New Jerusalem.  It also has some details about the birth of his grandson Noah.

So, it can be seen that each of the five books that make 1 Enoch build upon the previous books.  The entirety of the legitimacy of the Book of Enoch stands or falls on the legitimacy of each of these books.

Now we will compare the contents of each book with the Book of Truth.

So, we will start with the Book of Watchers.  This is the book that Jude the Jew quotes.

In this book, a lot of Angels are named that are not otherwise found anywhere in the Book of Truth.  Some of these Heavenly dignitaries are reported to have schemed to overthrow the Father of Truth and are called the Watchers.

It says that one of these Angels of Lies called Gadreel deceived Eve.  It also says that sin was introduced through the line of Cain while the line of Seth remained righteous.

The Book of Truth says that a serpent that deceived Eve (2 Corinthians  11:3).  It says that serpent was the Father of Lies – not some other Angel of Lies (Revelation 12:9-10).

The Book of Truth says that the curse of sin came upon the entire line of Adam – not one of his sons (Genesis 3:17-19).  It says that sin came through Adam – not one of his sons (Romans 5:12-14).

The Book of Watchers continues to tell about how some of these Heavenly dignitaries proceeded to marry human women and produce giants as also found in the Book of Truth (Genesis 6:1-4).  It then tells of how the Father of Truth had Noah build an Ark that was three hundred cubits long as does the Book of Truth (Genesis 6:13-15).

However, the Book of Watchers says that these giants were also three hundred cubits tall and so they would not have died from a flood that only covered the highest point on Earth by fifteen cubits according to the Book of Truth (Genesis 7:17-20).  They would have been more than thirty times taller than the tallest giant mentioned in the Book of Truth (Deuteronomy 3:11).

The Book of Watchers also says that these giants were imprisoned in bottomless pit (abyss) while the Book of Truth says that they were killed in the flood like every thing else that had the breath of life in it (Genesis 7:21-23).  The Book of Truth says that only the Angels of Lies who sinned by fathering the giants were imprisoned beneath the Earth (2 Peter 2:4).

Now we will move to the Book of Parables.  It builds upon the Book of Watchers.

It not only tells of a final judgment on the Angels of Lies (the Watchers) but also about the judgements that are to come upon mankind as well.  It introduces “the Son of Man” as the Messiah in Heaven – as Daniel had written hundreds of years earlier (Daniel 7:13-14).

However, the Book of Parables also identifies Enoch as the Son of Man in some places.  It also implies that Enoch had been enthroned in Heaven before his birth on Earth.

It is based on this that 2 Enoch and 3 Enoch state that Enoch became an Angel of Truth called Metatron after he was translated off of the Earth.  This contradicts the Book of Truth that says the people and Angels of Truth are two different things (2 Peter 2:10-11).

The resurrected Children of Truth are only like the Angels of Truth in not marrying one another (Matthew 22:30).  They are given a body like that of the Man of Truth (Yeshua HaMashiach aka Jesus Christ) – not Angels of Truth (Philippians 3:20-21)!

In fact, the Book of Parables appears to have been added much later to 1 Enoch.  Unlike the Book of Watchers, no fragment has ever been found at Qumran (the place of the Dead Sea Scrolls).

More than that, it is missing entirely from the earliest Greek translations of 1 Enoch that have been found.  There is no real evidence that it existed until about 300 AD.

This would mean that all copies of 1 Enoch are corrupted that contain it.  That would mean that the Book of Enoch was not preserved as the Father of Truth promised to do with His Word.

Now we will look at the Astronomical Book. It is tied to the words and deeds of Enoch in the previous two books.

The Astronomical Book contains a revelation that Enoch received that all months are thirty days long and there is an extra day after each set of three months to separate the seasons.  This allowed the same day of the year to always fall on the same day of the week.

This contradicts the calendar that the Father of Truth gave to Moses the Prophet of Truth.  It uses months that begin with each new moon – almost half of which are only twenty-nine days in length (Isaiah 66:23).

This calendar in the Book of Truth has years set by the month when the barley in Egypt is first ripe (Exodus 9:31-33).  This month is the first month of every year – which requires a leap month to be added every two or three years (Exodus 12:1-2).

Not only that, this 364-day calendar does not work in reality either.  The Essenes abandoned maintenance of The Astronomical Book when they found it snowing in what it said was summer after trying to use it for  almost two centuries.

So, we can be certain that the Astronomical Book is not from the Father of Truth.  He is never wrong about anything – ever!

Next, we will examine the Book of Dream Visions.  It is about Israel and the Watchers.

This book gives a history of the people of Israel all the way up to about 140 BC when the oldest fragment indicates that it was written.  It presents this history plus the final judgment as prophecy of Enoch.

It is not like the Book of Daniel – that told all of the events of the Maccabees several hundred years before any of them occurred.  It also does not mention any event after that until the final judgment - unlike Daniel who even gave the exact year that Messiah would be crucified (Daniel 9:25-27).

In fact, it makes no mention of the Messiah at all – unlike every single book in the Book of Truth.  It is not focused on Israel returning to the Father of Truth at the end of the Tribulation like the Book of Truth, but rather presents the Gentile nations like the Greeks being destroyed in a final judgment by the Father of Truth soon after the time of the Maccabees.

This obviously did not happen as it predicted.  In fact, there is not one single thing in the entire Book of Dream Visions to confirm that it is prophecy given to Enoch – or anyone else – by the Father of Truth.

It also does not mention one single reference to any of the terms of the Law of Truth in the Book of Dream Visions – or the entirety of 1 Enoch (The Book of Enoch).  These terms are referred to by every single book of the Prophets of Truth in the Original Covenant (Tanakh aka The Old Testament) as well as almost every single book of the Renewed Covenant (B'rit Chadashah aka The New Testament).

Most of the material in the last chapters about the End Times was already written in the Book of Truth.  The majority of material that is different concerns the Watchers – the Heavenly dignitaries.

So, it is obvious to anyone who is not willfully blind that this book is the work of a Prophet of Lies.  The contents of it are not consistent with the Book of Truth nor does it pass the test that all prophetic books of the Book of Truth have passed – some short-term and medium-term prophecies that all came to pass to confirm that the long-term prophecies are from the Father of Truth.

Finally, we will look at the Epistle of Enoch.  It is a summary of the previous books.

It begins with a vision of ten weeks that cover the entire history of the world.  It says that seven of these weeks have already passed by the time of the Maccabees and the last three weeks were about events would happen right after the time of the Maccabees that would end in the final judgment.

The events of the first seven weeks had all happened by the time of the oldest fragment.  Not one single event of the final three weeks has happened yet.

This means that this vision of  “the complete history of world” has over two thousand years of history that it did not see coming.  Those events of the last three weeks did not follow the events of the first seven weeks as shown in the vision.

It then gives a short warning to live righteously in view of the events of the last three weeks that are coming upon the reader soon.  It then expounds upon predestination explaining that it is impossible for the reader to heed the warning.  Finally it ends with condemnation to the reader for not heeding the warning that they could not possibly heed.

It then gives a short description of the birth of Noah and how those who were predetermined to be the Children of Light will enter the New Jerusalem.  This last section is separated from the rest of the Epistle of Enoch in the manuscripts at Qumran by a blank line indicating that they were written in later by another person.

So, we must conclude that the Book of Enoch should not be in the Book of Truth.

It has not only failed the tests of consistency with the rest of the Book of Truth and preservation by the Father of Truth, but it also has failed the tests of fulfilled prophecies and being factually accurate.  Not even the Essenes at Qumran considered the Book of Enoch to be part of the Book of Truth.

All of the books of the Book of Truth were stored in separate caves from the other writings at Qumran.  The later fragments of the books of the Book of Enoch were found in caves where books that the Essenes suspected to be the work of false teachers were kept.  These scrolls were kept there until the name of the Father of Truth could be cut out of them, so they could be destroyed with damaging His name.

However, there are some other tests given by the Book of Truth that the Book of Enoch would fail as well.  These concerned the authorship of it.

The Book of Truth says that any book that is in it must be either the work of a Prophet of Truth or an Apostle of Truth (Ephesians 2:20).  Even though Enoch was a real Prophet of Truth, it is apparent that the author of the Book of Enoch was not him.

Even if Enoch had written the Book of Enoch, then there is another test that the Book of Enoch would fail.  Nothing written by Enoch could pass this test.

The Man of Truth said that salvation was of the Jews (John 4:22).  The Words of the Father of Truth were only committed to those marked as Jews by circumcision (Romans 3:1-2).

Enoch was the Gentile ancestor of Abraham (Luke 3:34-37).  Abraham was the father of circumcision that marked his descendants as Jews (Romans 4:12).

So, the Book of Enoch would fail this test of authorship as well that the Book of Truth requires.  The Book of Truth makes it plain that it cannot belong in the Book of Truth.

Therefore, we need to heed the warnings of the Apostles of Truth about the Book of Enoch.

Jude the Jew called those who spoke evil about Angels that they only knew about from the Book of Enoch - but had not seen themselves - corrupt deceivers (Jude 1:8-10).  He warned that the same judgement that these Teachers of Lies have been teaching about these Angels that they have spoken evil against is going to happen to them (Jude 1:11-13).

James the Jude warned that these Teachers of Lies were among those that Enoch had said would be destroyed when Messiah comes to bring judgment on the ungodly (Jude 1:14-16).  He warned they were among the mockers that the Apostles of Truth had warned would come in the last days before the Tribulation - who did not have the Spirit of Truth in them (Jude 1:17-19).

Peter the Jew (Sh’mon aka Simon aka Simeon aka Cephas aka The Apostle Peter) also warned that Teachers of Lies would rise up among the Children of Truth to later be destroyed with the rest of the wicked (2 Peter 2:1).  He warned that many of them would follow these Teachers of Lies to destruction and cause the Book of Truth to be spoken against (2 Peter 2:2).

Peter the Jew warned that these Teachers of Lies would do this to sell things to the Children of Truth because they would be covetous, but they would be destroyed in the end (2 Peter 2:3).  He warned that they would be destroyed in the future as surely as the ungodly had been destroyed in the past (2 Peter 2:4-6).

Peter the Jew warned that these Teachers of Lies – who spoke evil of Angels– would be punished on Judgement Day (2 Peter 2:9-11).  He warned that they had never seen these Angels in a vision from the Spirit of Truth, but only knew what that they had learned about from another source - like the Book of Enoch - with a mind that was devoid of the Spirit of Truth (2 Peter 2:12).

Peter the Jew warned that these Teachers of Lies were in the congregations of the Children of Truth to deceive them due to their love of money but would be destroyed in the end (2 Peter 2:13-14).  He warned that like Balaam, they had once walked in the way of Truth, but had lost their minds when they turned from it to gain money (2 Peter 2:15-16).

Peter the Jew warned that since these Teachers of Lies no longer could bring the Word of Truth to the Children of Truth, then they would experience the judgment that they taught would happen to the Angels from the Book of Enoch (2 Peter 2:17).  He warned that they would face this judgment because they had spoke the Word of Lies to cause the Children of Truth to return to the sins that they had once escaped (2 Peter 2:18-19).

Paul the Jew warned that many of these Teachers of Lies were circumcised descendants of Israel, but they taught the Word of Lies from sources like the Book of Enoch because they wanted the Children of Truth to give them money (Titus 1:10-11).  He warned that the Word of Truth must be used to rebuke the Children of Truth who had been deceived by these Teachers of Lies -  who had appealed to the sinful desires of their flesh to turn them from the Word of Truth (Titus 1:12-13).

Paul the Jew warned that the Children of Truth need to treat Jewish fables - including the Book of Enoch - like the commandments of circumcised descendants of Israel that turned the Children of Truth away from the Word of Truth (Titus 1:14).  He said that these circumcised descendants of Israel taught these things because they did not know the Father of Truth – as their works proved (Titus 1:15-16).

These Apostles of Truth warned believers against the Book of Enoch - specifically quoting from it to make it plain - as well as many other sources from the Rabbis.  They warned that the Rabbis are liars and things like the Book of Enoch are no better than the Book of Mormon.

So, what should be in the Book of Truth?

The truth is that the Book of Truth has no missing books.  It contains the Incorruptible Word of Truth that the Father of Truth promised to preserve through the ages.

The Book of Truth contains two inseparable covenants.  These work together just like the four Gospels work together as a four-part harmony.

Those who teach the Book of Truth is incomplete or corrupted are teaching the Doctrine of Lies.  They are not teaching the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

Those who preach using another book are preaching another gospel based on another Jesus -who is not the Man of Truth - that was given to the author by another spirit - that is not the Spirit of Truth.  They are often the hidden danger that in the midst of the congregations of the Children of Truth like a snake in the leaves.

Some of these deceivers have made the Messianic Mess.  Other deceivers have used the same tactics to turn many of the Children of Truth to Neo-paganism.

Other deceivers have used another tactic in the Great Deception that is causing many to turn from following the Man of Truth without even realizing it.  They have assaulted the Book of Truth through corrupted thought-for-thought translations that include one disturbing sentence that is not found in any original source document.

With so much deception, how can you protect yourself from being deceived?

Fortunately, once you learn a few simple rules it is not that hard to pick a good translation.  After that, you can learn to rightly divide the Word of Truth by following the rules for interpreting scripture that are laid out in the Book of Truth.

Once you have the Word of Truth available to study, you are ready to begin protecting yourself from deception.   The only other thing you need is the Spirit of Truth.

The Children of Truth can overcome all deception because the Spirit of Truth lives in them (Romans 8:9).  The Spirit of Truth is greater than the Spirits of Lies that are in the world that speak through the Prophets of Lies (1 John 4:1-4).

The Spirit of Truth will guide the Children of Truth into all truth and confirm the Word of Truth (John 16:13).  They just have to be willing to follow the leading of the Spirit of Truth (Galatians 5:16).

When the Children of Truth follow the Spirit of Truth, then they will not have mind ruled by their flesh that cannot keep the Law of Truth (Romans 8:4-8).  Instead, they will have the mind of the Man of Truth – who kept the Law of Truth in the way always intended by the Father of Truth (1 Peter 4:1-2).

The love of the Children of Truth for the Man of Truth will cause them to keep his commandments (John 14:15).  The more they keep his commandments, the more they will know him (John 14:21).

It is those who do not keep the commandments of the Father of Truth who do not know Him (Matthew 7:21-23).  The more the Children of Truth love the Father of Truth the more they will keep His commandments (1 John 5:3).

The Children of Truth will be able to overcome the deception of the world because of their faith in the Man of Truth (1 John 5:4-5).  They will be able to overcome the Father of Lies by the Word of Truth in their mouths and the death of the Man of Truth because they love the Man of Truth more than their own lives (Revelation 12:9-11).

The Children of Truth will be able to stand against every deception of the Father of Lies when they put on all of the armor that the Father of Truth has provided them to fight against the Spirits of Lies (Ephesians 6:11-12).  Their sexual conduct will be protected by truth, their heart will set on doing what the Father of Truth says is right, they will be ready to bring the Good News to other people, their confidence in what the Father of Truth says will lead them to action that shields them from every attack of the Father of Lies, salvation will protect their minds, and they will be able to use the Word of Truth to attack the Spirit of Lies (Ephesians 6:13-17).

The Word of Truth will allow the Children of Truth to not be deceived by the Word of Lies that is empty and useless (2 Timothy 2:14-16).   It will allow them to discern between those who speak truth out of a sincere heart and those who speak lies out of a perverse heart (Hebrews 4:12).

When the Children of Truth hide the Word of Truth in their hearts, then they cannot be deceived into breaking the commandments of the Father of Truth (Psalm 119:10-11).  They will be not even be able to be deceived into departing from walking in truth by signs and wonders like everyone else (Matthew 24:24).

You will come into the House of Truth when you will make a commitment to obey the Man of Truth in everything because you believe that the Father of Truth raised him from the dead (Romans 10:9).  Then the Spirit of Truth will live in you and witness to your spirit that you are a Child of Truth (Romans 8:14-16).  Then the Word of Truth will be able to live in your heart, so that you will not be deceived by things like the Book of Enoch (Colossians 3:16).

Come into the House of Truth!